Hydrogen Peroxide and Oxygen Therapy are NOT Dangerous
Article Source
So What Killed Mrs. Bibeau?
Well,
here's something interesting. The coroner's report said she was taking the
drugs Tegretol and Copaxone.
Look these drugs up in the Physician's Desk Reference.
You'll find that they
cause a variety of side affects including echymosis
(bruising), infection, bleeding, metorrhagia,
thrombosis, clotting problems, liver damage and infections. These are the exact
symptoms found in Mrs. Bibeau when she arrived at the
hospital.
Peroxide
has caused no significant harm in the millions of infusions worldwide given by
doctors over a span of decades. Contrast that to a minimum of 140,000 deaths
caused by drugs prescribed by doctors every year. That fact alone should force
the pathologist to look first at the drugs as a primary cause of this woman's
death, not peroxide.
So why is
the system putting a spin on this death and covering up the real cause? Well,
it wouldn't be the first time that an effective alternative therapy and doctor
was railroaded. It's too easy for the pathologist, the coroner, and the
mainstream media to attack what they don't understand.
Drugs are
good, so peroxide must be bad, right? I hope you now know better!
Dr. Mercola's Comment
On Wednesday, Jan. 12, 2005,
the TV show, 60 Minutes, did a story on Dr. Jim Shortt,
a physician from North Carolina, who is accused of murdering a
patient because he intravenously infused hydrogen peroxide as a treatment. Allegedly,
the hydrogen peroxide produced bubbles in the patient's bloodstream that
eventually caused multiple organ failure and cardiac arrest.
Using IV
oxidative medicine is not something I have done before as the simple, less
aggressive approaches of diet optimization, exercise programs and emotional
work have been so useful for most of my patients. However, I suspect this
therapy, properly applied, could be beneficial to many, and it is sad to see it
being vulcanized in the popular press.
The mass
media focus on Dr. Shortt has sparked a lot of
controversy, confusion and debate. A friend of mine and respected colleague,
Robert Jay Rowen, MD, who is president of the
International Oxidation Medicine Association, asked me if I would therefore
publish his insights below to help clear the air, which I urge everyone to
read.
The press
is concerned about one death that, upon further examination, as you will note
below, might not even be related to the treatment. I certainly don't want to
minimize anyone's death, but more than 55,000 people died from taking Vioxx and we are not seeing in excess of 50,000 times the
press on this issue.
In fact, we
are not seeing much coverage of the Vioxx horror at
all from the mass media relative to that drug disaster. Shouldn't a situation
responsible for so many deaths be dominating our national headlines still, as
the tsunami disaster has been?
Shouldn't
responsible journalists like those at 60 Minutes and all the other major TV
news programs be relentlessly probing Merck and the FDA to find out all the
responsible parties for the Vioxx disaster and ensure
justice is served?
Why would
they possibly run a "scare" story on a single physician who may or
may not have been responsible for a single person's tragic death when more than
55,000 deaths have occurred due to some very serious issues with the drug
companies and the FDA?
Shouldn't the network news magazines, with the amount of
people they reach, be diligently focused on making sure people are very wary of
taking pharmaceuticals, even if they are "FDA approved," since the
single FDA-approved drug Vioxx has killed more than
55,000?
Well, they
should be. But then, we have to ask where the priorities of some in the mass
media might really reside. We have to remember that the drug companies,
including Merck, collectively "contribute" more than $3 billion a
year on consumer advertising of their pharmaceuticals, most of it to the major
television networks.
If only Dr.
Shortt had the foresight to contribute $3 billion in
advertising with the mass media, I'm quite convinced the story on him would
never have aired.
The TRUTH
By Robert Jay Rowen,
MD, President, International Oxidative
Medicine Association
You may
have heard about Dr. Jim Shortt in South Carolina. He's accused of murdering one his
patients, Mrs. Katherine Bibeau, by giving her
intravenous hydrogen peroxide. Maybe you read the story in your local paper or
saw the hatchet job CBS did on 60 Minutes.
In charging
Dr. Shortt with murder, the coroner and pathologist
claim this woman died as a result of bubbles in her bloodstream. They allege
these bubbles were caused by the hydrogen peroxide infusion Dr. Shortt gave his patient. But this is absolutely impossible.
Let me tell you why.
Why Peroxide Therapy Is Safe
Hydrogen
peroxide therapy uses the same stuff you pour on your cuts, but at much lower
concentrations. The doctor takes a half-teaspoon of peroxide and dilutes it in
81/2 ounces of sugar water. That means, the peroxide
Mrs. Bibeau received was just 1/100th as strong as
the stuff you put on cuts.
When you
put hydrogen peroxide on a cut, you get bubbles. Those bubbles are simply the
hydrogen peroxide releasing oxygen.
When the
peroxide enters the bloodstream, it releases oxygen there too. The roughly
half-teaspoon of peroxide the doctor uses will release about 25 cc of oxygen.
And since it is administered through an IV, it doesn't go in all at once but
over the course of two hours.
Is that
enough to have killed this woman? Look at what the mainstream medical literature
says. According to one physiology textbook, it takes 50 cc of air to cause
damage to the body. That damage can include a sudden drop in blood pressure or
changes to the heartbeat.
But that 50 cc of air would have to be administered
instantly in order to cause this kind of damage. In order to kill someone,
however, the medical literature says it takes 300 cc of air administered
instantly. (J Vasc Interv Radiol, 2001; 12:1291-1295)
At most,
Mrs. Bibeau received only 25 cc of oxygen. So even if
Dr. Shortt had administered it instantly, it still
would have been less than 10 percent of the amount needed to kill her.
And even if
she had been given 10 times as much peroxide, it still
wouldn't have killed her. Why? Because there's a huge
difference between oxygen and air.
Air is composed mostly of nitrogen,
which remains in the blood for long periods of time and can do great harm
(think of the bends in scuba divers.) Oxygen, on the other hand, is rapidly
consumed, easy to absorb, and vital for good health.
Your Body Burns Oxygen Instantly
The
pathologist claims that he found bubbles in Mrs. Bibeau's
bloodstream. Yet she died four days after her hydrogen peroxide treatment.
Could those bubbles possibly come from the hydrogen peroxide therapy? Of course
not! Any pre-med student will tell you oxygen is consumed so quickly, it's
impossible any bubbles would have lasted all that time.
Even if she were given
gallons of oxygen fast enough to kill her instantly, her body would have
continued absorbing it, even after death. You see, cells remain active and
continue using oxygen long after the heart stops.
But only 25
cc of oxygen, four days before and given during a two-hour IV? Your body burns
that much oxygen in mere seconds! Oxygen in these amounts simply can't kill
someone. And doctors who administer hydrogen peroxide therapy have known this
for decades.
Wrong, Wrong, Wrong!
Hydrogen
peroxide is not the monster therapy the so-called authorities are making it out
to be. The medical examiner is wrong. The coroner is wrong. 60 Minutes is
wrong.
There are
no medical reports anywhere that indicate properly administered hydrogen
peroxide could cause any of the skin markings, lab abnormalities and/or
clotting in Mrs. Bibeau when she arrived at the ER.
On the contrary, hundreds of reputable doctors (including me) have given
millions of peroxide treatments over many, many years. And thousands of
grateful patients credit this amazing therapy with saving their lives!
Hydrogen
peroxide has been reported as effective for many treatments, including the
following:
-
Asthma
-
Yeast
infections
-
Lupus and
autoimmune diseases
-
Chronic
lung diseases
-
Legionnaire's
disease
-
Crohn's
disease
Peer review
medical journals have reported absolutely stunning effects in human heart and
circulation disease including arterial plaque removal, wound healing, pneumonia increased oxygenation and as an adjunctive
treatment for cancer. And I've personally witnessed dramatic improvements in
people with cardiovascular disease, cancer, multiple sclerosis and certain
types of arthritis.
And in all
of those cases and patient histories, there has never been any proof that
properly administered hydrogen peroxide causes any harm.
What You Can Do
Please help
spread the truth! Share this article with everyone you can. Send them to our
Web site.
If you're a
South Carolina citizen, you must write your state-elected officials and
demand an independent investigation into the coroner's report. Demand that the
death certificate reflect the real cause. You can find your state senator's
information here. Locate your state representative's information at this site.
If you're
not a South Carolina resident, you can still help. Please consider a
contribution to Dr. Shortt's legal defense fund. Send your donation to Free Choice Legal Defense Fund, c/o Transfer Point, 1073 Statler Rd., Columbia, S.C. 29210. Any funds left over will be used
to secure protection for oxidation therapies and/or press for more medical
freedom laws in still unprotected states.
An innocent
man's freedom is at stake. And a life-saving therapy is under attack. Please
help!
(I also
urge you to read more about the Associated Press story on Dr. Shortt and the hatchet job CBS did on 60 Minutes.)
|